IELTSwithJurabek
Are you ready to begin your reading test?
Please wait
Are you ready to begin your reading test?
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading Passage 1
This document provides a review of the academic literature relating to children's media literacy. It focuses primarily on television, radio, the internet and mobile telephony, and specifically addresses the various barriers to, and enablers of media literacy in the UK. The document begins by exploring the development of the three dimensions contained in Ofcom's definition of media literacy: 'the ability to access, understand and create communications in a variety of contexts'.
In terms of access, the literature suggests that most children, even at quite a young age, already possess the competencies needed to gain access to media content: they are quite skilled at using the available technologies and are also able to use the associated software. As they become older, they become more aware of regulatory mechanisms, and take these into account in seeking to make their own decisions.
The large majority of children show some awareness of risks relating to giving personal information, such as contact details, on the internet, although they are less aware of financial dangers such as those relating to credit card use or communication of banking details.
In terms of understanding, most of the research literature relates to the development of children's understanding of television, rather than of other media such as the internet. This literature suggests that children's awareness of areas such as the difference between representation and reality, and the persuasive role of advertising, develops both as a function of their increasing knowledge of the world, and as a result of their broader cognitive development. Children also learn to cope with potentially unwanted or upsetting emotional responses, and to form critical judgments about areas such as television violence, by employing forms of media literacy.
By contrast, when it comes to creativity, there has been less academic research relating to the 'older' media such as video and analogue radio than to the new media. Research here suggests that there is considerable potential for media to be used as a means of self-expression, not least by socially disadvantaged groups; that creative involvement in media production (particularly in the context of education) can make an important contribution to the development of critical understanding; and that new media such as online gaming and mobile telephony provide possibilities for new forms of interaction.
Among the barriers to media literacy are several inter-related factors, of which social class and economic status are the most well-established. In the UK, these barriers limit children's access to the internet, although not to established media such as radio or television. Less is known about other potential barriers such as disability, or about the role of individual dispositions or motivations. It is important to recognise that such barriers may affect the quality of media use as well as the quantity - for example, in terms of the available functionality of the technology, the location or level of support for use.
Potential enablers of media literacy include parents, teachers and other agencies such as broadcasters. Research suggests that parental mediation can play an important role in developing younger children's media literacy, for example in understanding the relationships between representation and reality. However, the role of parents depends upon broader beliefs about childrearing, and many parents do not play as great a role as they like to suggest. Meanwhile, education about the media has a long history, at least in secondary schools in the UK, although it remains a marginal aspect of the compulsory curriculum, and is rarely found in primary schools.
There is also a growing body of evidence concerning the effectiveness of particular teaching strategies in developing media literacy.
The review provides an indication of several important gaps in the literature. These include specific media, such as radio, mobile phones and online gaming, and particular population groups, such as younger children, those with disabilities, and ethnic minority groups. There is a particular need for research about children's ability to evaluate internet content, and about their awareness of new commercial strategies in the media. Of the three areas in Ofcom's definition, 'creativity' is by far the least well-researched. New technologies and media forms will also pose new challenges and demands in terms of media literacy, so it is important that research in this field is regularly updated.
In terms of methodology, the review finds that a great deal of research in the field is based on self-reporting, and recommends that there should be more observational studies that explore how media literacy is used in everyday life. In relation to education, there is a need to develop new approaches to assessing the effectiveness of media education in influencing media use outside the classroom.
Finally, the review reminds us that media literacy is multi-dimensional. The nature and extent of the media literacy that individuals develop depends very much on the purposes for which they use the media in the first place. Different social groups may also develop and require different forms of media literacy in line with their motivations and preferences in media use. As such, we need to beware of adopting an over-simplistic approach to assessing levels of media literacy among the population at large.
Complete the notes below. Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.
Media literacy involves:
a. having to communications
Research suggests that:
b. understanding communications
Most research has been done on children and , and not on alternative forms of communication.
It suggests that:
c. creating communications
Most research has focused on the , indicating their use for:
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1? In boxes 8-13 on your answer sheet write: TRUE if the statement agrees, FALSE if it contradicts, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information.
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14-26, which are based on Reading Passage 2.
According to some educational theories, it is not a good thing ever to be wrong, and it is an important part of the teacher's function to keep his pupils from error, planning every step of the way so that they avoid pitfalls. There are no doubt certain types of learning situation where mistakes are better avoided. On the other hand, it is also quite clear that error can play a highly constructive role in the development of thinking, and it is now well established that the advent of error can be a sign of progress.
Many examples can be given, but the following example is in some ways particularly interesting. Children were given a task which involved balancing a set of blocks across a narrow beam. Sometimes the blocks had their weight evenly spread along their length, so that the center of gravity and their geometric center coincided, but sometimes they were more heavily weighted at one end. When the weight of the block was not symmetrically distributed, the difference between the ends was sometimes obvious, because one was bigger than the other. However, sometimes the blocks were weighted at one end with metal which was hidden inside them, and in this case the difference was invisible.
On this task, the youngest subjects were often successful in situations where older ones failed, and still older ones succeeded. What seemed to happen was that the very young children were guided almost entirely by the 'feel' of the blocks: they had no kind of theory. They took each block in turn and simply balanced it. But primitive theories soon appeared on the scene. The children began to try to operate systematically and according to rules. It should be noted that there was no intervention from teachers - the children evolved the rules spontaneously.
Of course, it often happened that the children did not state the rules that they were using, though remarks like 'Things balance in the middle' were recorded by researchers. Even without such explicit formulations, however, the existence of rules can be inferred from observations of behavior, just as the operation of some grammatical rules is inferred from the speech of children, long before they can themselves give any account of what these rules are.
This is the kind of thing that was observed to happen. The children at the intermediate stage would lift an asymmetrically weighted block and, apparently ignoring the 'feel', would place it down across the bar at the midpoint of its length. It would fall off. They would then try again, doing exactly the same thing - and of course, it would fall again. But sometimes the 'midpoint' rule would work, because for some blocks the weight was equally distributed. This partial success seemed to be enough to keep the theory alive for some time. It was as if the child had to consolidate his first theory with counterexamples. And then the modified theory would tend to grow up alongside the original one, instead of ousting it suddenly.
It is not surprising if, when rules are first devised for dealing with a complex system, they should be inadequate and oversimplified, so that their application leads to error in certain cases. What is of interest is the manner in which the inadequate rules are replaced by better ones and the errors transcended.
In the case we have been considering, the situation was such that the child could clearly see that his theory was wrong. Sometimes it is not so obvious - and being wrong without knowing it is clearly not of much value. So if we are going to try to put the occurrence of error to good use in education, we must ask how we can make children aware of their errors - how we can help to bring them to the critical realization that they are wrong.
There is a very famous historical example of this being done by a great teacher. In his dialogue Meno, the Greek philosopher Plato describes how his teacher Socrates gave a slave boy a lesson in geometry. The boy came to the lesson with the belief that to double the area of a square, you have to double the length of its sides. However, this is mathematically incorrect.
Socrates proceeded, by careful questioning, to lead the boy into self-contradiction. The boy then acknowledged that his original belief was wrong, and that he did not know how long the sides of the new square would have to be if the area was to be doubled. Socrates concluded that the boy was now in a stronger position than before, despite not knowing the answer to the original question, because he was aware of his error. Socrates went on to argue that as long as people think they know something, there is clearly no hope of change, for they are satisfied with their state. But they cannot be satisfied with being ignorant. They will want to get themselves out of this state.
The former of these two assertions can scarcely be challenged. But what about the latter? Will they want to get themselves out of it? Or will they merely be discouraged and give up? What makes us want to learn?
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 2? In boxes 14-17 on your answer sheet write: YES if the statement agrees, NO if it contradicts, or NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks.
Complete the summary using the list of words A-K below. Write the correct letter, A-K, in boxes 18-23 on your answer sheet.
List of Words
Children were given a task involving blocks of wood. The blocks varied according to how their weight was distributed: the weight distribution was 18 in some but not in others. This was because the others were either tapered or had had 19 inserted in them. In the latter case, the differences between the blocks were 20. The children were instructed to balance each block on a 21. Some children, usually the youngest ones, did the task by dealing with each block 22. In other cases, children quickly started to look for 23. For example, they initially presumed that all the blocks balanced in the middle. They then had to revise their ideas.
Complete the sentences below. Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
24 The slave boy gave Socrates an incorrect answer to a problem.
25 Socrates led the slave boy to recognise his error by him.
26 According to Socrates, people dislike feeling .
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3
A new exhibition traces the history of animal painting in Europe from the anatomically inaccurate to the highly sentimental.
The first picture you see in the exhibition Fierce Friends: Artists and Animals 1750-1900 is of a giraffe - sort of. Painted in about 1785, the creature in it has the neck of a giraffe, but its back is too long, its haunches too developed, and its legs are out of proportion to its body. Like most Europeans in the 18th century, the anonymous French artist who painted it had never seen a real giraffe. He relied on eyewitness descriptions, and on the skin of a giraffe the scientist and adventurer Francois Levallard had recently brought back from South Africa.
Exotic animals shipped back to Europe at this time usually died soon after arrival, even supposing they survived the voyage. Until about 1793, taxidermy consisted of stuffing the carcass with straw, so the results fell apart after a few years. This meant that ordinary men and women had very few opportunities to see exotic animals at first hand until the establishment of the first zoos - in Paris in 1793, in London in 1818. For an accurate depiction of a giraffe, Europeans had to wait until 1827 and the arrival of the first living specimen, when the Swiss artist Jacques-Laurent Agasse painted his lovely study of the Nubian giraffe sent to King George IV by the Ottoman Viceroy of Egypt.
For most people in the 18th century, animals meant farm animals, carriage horses, and food for the table. But the Enlightenment was an age both of exploration and of discovery, as more and more species of animals, birds, fish and insects were identified and brought back from the South Seas, Africa and India. In 1740, almost 6,000 species of animals were known to science. One hundred years later, the number had risen to 24,000, including many that are familiar to most children today as a matter of course - ostrich, rhino, orangutan and buffalo.
Kings and princes, to be sure, had their own menageries, and wealthy collectors added rare birds, fish and mammals (fish own side-by-side with two-headed calves and fake dragons) to their cabinets of curiosities. In this way, the forerunners of modern zoos and museums developed along parallel lines. On special occasions an entrepreneur might exhibit a wild beast to the paying public, as was the case when the Venetian artist Pietro Longhi painted bored masqueraders at carnival time gawping at a pathetic rhinoceros. Out of such displays came another invention of the 19th century, the circus. Wider knowledge of the animal kingdom came with the publication of George-Louis Leclerc Comte de Buffon's multi-volume Histoire Naturelle (1749-1788).
Based on specimens studied in the royal menageries, this remarkable book is still treasured - not for its scientific accuracy, but for its glorious hand-coloured engravings. Far too expensive for most people to buy, it at least helped to make men and women aware of the beauty of certain animals, as we can see in a service of Sevres porcelain created in 1793, where the decorative motifs are taken from the birds drawn by de Buffon.
Gradually, humans began to notice that dumb creatures have feelings. Man cannot afford to feel pity for an animal bred for food. When that wonderful artist Jean-Baptiste Oudry shows a display of dead game in the 1740s, he is simply painting a luxury - fresh meat - available only to the well-off. Peasants ate bread. His lavish paintings were considered suitable for the dining rooms of the nobility because no one then expressed the slightest ethical or moral hesitation about hunting and killing rabbit, deer and boar for the table, or about slaughtering such vermin as foxes and wolves.
Domestic animals were a different story. When Oudry depicts a hound with her newborn puppies, the simple picture has revolutionary undertones. The pretty white bitch, noticing that two of her pups have fallen asleep and are not getting the nourishment they need, is full of maternal solicitude. At a time when French noblewomen still sent their babes out to wet-nurses, even an animal is shown to display true maternal feeling. And in 1824, the year Delacroix shows two horses killed in battle, there is a new element in man's attitude towards the wanton slaughter of beautiful creatures: compassion. Delacroix's little masterpiece pierces the heart, whereas the grotesque memorial to animals killed in war unveiled in London recently leaves the viewer cold. But the moral impulse behind the creation of both works is exactly the same.
Once animals can be loved for their innocence or good nature, it becomes more difficult to treat them cruelly. Almost 15 years before Jean-Baptiste Greuze painted a picture of a young girl mourning her pet sparrow (in 1765), William Hogarth published his series of prints, The Stages of Cruelty, showing how the mistreatment of animals leads inexorably to the devaluing of all forms of life, including human. In this show, it is almost impossible to look at Emile Edouard Mouchy's horrifying depiction of the vivisection of a dog (1832) without wincing. Though such experiments represent a necessary evil, our very squeamishness represents another rung upward in the moral evolution of mankind.
This process started in the early 19th century, when men began to see in the animal kingdom a mirror image of their own feelings. In his portrayal of a horse frightened by lightning, Gericault lets us see the animal's tensed body, foam-flecked mouth and brow furrowed in anxiety. In The Jealous Lioness of about 1885, the German artist Paul Meyerheim shows a caged lioness enraged at the attention her mate is paying to a beautiful lion tamer. Gradually, artists began to blur the distinctions between animal and human. When Edwin Landseer in High Life and Low Life contrasts a mongrel guard dog with a deer hound, the animals are surrogates for their absent masters, butcher and nobleman. All these artists emphasized the physical and emotional resemblances between animals and human beings.
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C, or D.
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 3? In boxes 32-36 on your answer sheet write: YES if the statement agrees, NO if it contradicts, or NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say.
Complete each sentence with the correct ending, A-F below.
37 Delacroix's 1824 painting .
38 Greuze's 1765 painting .
39 Hogarth's series of prints .
40 Landseer's High Life and Low Life .