IELTSwithJurabek
Are you ready to begin your reading test?
Please wait
Are you ready to begin your reading test?
Answer Questions 1-13, which are based on the text below.
The decades following photography's experimental beginnings in the 1820s and the public availability of a practical photographic process from 1839 were characterized by the introduction of a wide number of photographic processes. The following are a few of the most significant.
Announced in Paris in 1839, the daguerreotype was the first publicly available photographic process. The daguerreotype image was created on a silvered metal plate exposed to iodine fumes, forming a light-sensitive surface of silver iodide. Development was achieved by exposing the plate to fumes of heated mercury and then fixing the image in a salt solution. The daguerreotype produced remarkably sharp pictures, but unlike competing processes, each daguerreotype was unique. This proved to be its major drawback, compared to other processes from which unlimited copies could be made.
One of the oldest and longest surviving photographic processes, the cyanotype or blueprint, was invented by Sir John Herschel in 1840, using a mixture of ferric ammonium citrate and potassium ferricyanide to produce a light sensitive paper. As a relatively simple process to prepare and manipulate - it required no development or fixing other than washing - it was popular among amateurs throughout the nineteenth century and has also been widely used by engineers and architects for reproducing technical drawings (blueprints).
William Henry Fox Talbot's calotype process, the first practical negative-positive photographic process, was patented by him in 1841. A sheet of good quality paper was first treated with light-sensitive silver compounds before exposure in the camera. This produced an image in reverse, known as a negative, which was then developed in gallo-nitrate of silver and fixed. This concept of photography, allowing the production of an unlimited number of prints from a single image, has formed the basis of photographic practice until recently, when it started being challenged by digital imagery. The calotype negative was the subject of many refinements in the 1840s and 50s, and it was common practice for photographers to apply heated wax in order to increase printing transparency and lessen the visibility of the paper fibres.
Frederick Scott Archer's wet collodion process, announced in 1851, became the standard photographic process for both amateurs and professionals from the mid-1850s until the early 1880s. The process proved immediately popular, and within a decade had superseded both the daguerreotype and the calotype processes. To prepare the negative for exposure, a sheet of glass was coated with a solution of iodised collodion (a syrupy liquid composed of soluble gun-cotton, ether and alcohol) and then made light-sensitive by immersion in a bath of silver nitrate. Known as a wet process because the glass negative required sensitising, exposing and processing while the chemicals were still damp, it required significant skill to manipulate, but produced a negative of unsurpassed sharpness and a broad tonal range.
The albumen print, announced by the French photographer and publisher Louis-Desire Blanquart-Evrard in 1850, was the most widespread print medium in use between the mid-1850s and the 1890s. While the printing process was chemically similar to an earlier process which was called the 'salted paper process', the albumen print was generally distinguishable by the glossy sheen imparted by a preliminary sizing of the paper with albumen (egg white) and salt. After the albumen coating had been applied, the paper was made light sensitive by the addition of silver nitrate, and printed in contact with the negative. The fixed print could then be toned to create a wide variety of colours, ranging from purple-black to a rich chocolate brown. Although it continued to be used well into the twentieth century, its popularity declined after the mid-1890s, in favour of a variety of manufactured papers.
The fact that all silver-based photographic images tended to fade was a source of concern from the earliest days of photography, and considerable research was carried out in attempts to produce permanent images. Perhaps the most successful of these was the carbon process. First patented by A L Poitevin in 1855, the process utilised the fact that gelatin mixed with an alkaline bichromate becomes insoluble when exposed to light. When printing from a negative, those parts of the image representing shadow tones were hardened by the exposure to light, while light areas, protected from exposure, remained unhardened and could be subsequently washed away. Carbon and other pigments could be used as colouring agents to obtain an almost unlimited range of tones in the final image. Because the process does not employ compounds derived from silver, the resulting image is less likely to fade and was widely used in book illustration in the 1870s and 1880s.
Complete the table below. Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
| Process | Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|---|
| daguerreotype | Images were very | Each image was |
| cyanotype | Was comparatively to use | |
| calotype | First process which created an image called , from which unlimited copies could be made | |
| wet collodion process | Produced high-quality images | Needed considerable to use |
| albumen print | Produced glossy images in a range of | |
| carbon process | Produced permanent images because it did not use any products based on |
Do the following statements agree with the information given in the text? Write TRUE if it agrees, FALSE if it contradicts, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information.
Answer Questions 14-26, which are based on the text below.
A It's one of our most powerful medical treatments, and certainly our most widely effective. In recent years, it's been found to help eliminate or lessen the symptoms associated with clinical depression, irritable bowel syndrome, panic attacks, coughing and ADHD, among other conditions. This name of this wonderful treatment? It's the 'placebo effect', the remarkable power of the human brain to unconsciously influence the functioning and perception of the body.
B The term, which is Latin for 'I shall please', was first used some time during the 1700s, but the concept itself dates back centuries. Historically, doctors believed that one of their key duties, in addition to curing a patient, was to console him or her, providing a boost to the morale that could help them to get better faster - sometimes in the form of a dummy medicine that had no effect beyond instilling the expectation of improvement in the patient's brain. It's now widely recognised that, while largely ineffective in improving objective symptoms, such as high blood pressure or an infection, for instance, placebos are genuinely effective in treating subjective, self-reported symptoms, including all sorts of pain. Placebos can take all sorts of forms: inert sugar pills, sham surgeries and saline injections.
C The singular power of expectations has been demonstrated in a variety of studies. In one, for example, patients given a placebo pill that is referred to as a muscle relaxer will experience muscle relaxation, while those given a placebo called a muscle stimulator will experience muscle tension. The flip side of the placebo, the nocebo effect, is just as powerful - negative expectations can cause as much harm as positive ones can do good. In other studies, it's been shown that pills which are red, yellow or orange in colour are more likely to provide a stimulating effect, while blue and green ones are more often perceived as sedating. One study even found that bigger pills are better when it comes to placebo performance.
D The science that underlies all of these studies isn't well understood at this point. Scientists have conducted some imaging research into the brain on placebos, and they've found that ingestion of a placebo billed as a painkiller leads to increased activity in several areas of the cerebral cortex, as compared to an actual painkiller. These areas are involved in so-called 'higher' functions like memory, attention, thought and consciousness. A pain-killing placebo, it seems, works differently from a painkiller.
E In a recent headache study, conducted by researchers at Harvard Medical School, 66 participants who suffer from chronic migraines were given six envelopes, each containing a pill to be taken after their next migraine attack. Two envelopes were labelled 'Maxalt' - the brand name for the widely-used migraine drug rizatriptan - in order to generate positive expectations, while two had no label, to produce neutral expectations, and two were labelled 'placebo,' to generate negative expectations. But for each of the three labels, one envelope held a genuine rizatriptan pill, and one contained a placebo. This allowed the researchers to cross-compare the effectiveness of rizatriptan + positive expectations, rizatriptan alone, and rizatriptan + negative expectations, as well as positive, neutral and negative expectations in isolation.
F When the scientists analysed the participants' self-reported pain reductions after taking the pills, the power of the placebo was proven yet again. People who'd taken a placebo pill labelled Maxalt got just as much pain relief as those who'd taken a Maxalt pill labelled as a placebo. Additionally, people who took a Maxalt correctly labelled as Maxalt reported about twice as much pain reduction as those who took a Maxalt pill labelled as placebo. In other words, in treating a complex, chronic form of pain like migraine, the effectiveness of pure expectations was roughly equal to the effectiveness of the pharmaceutical itself.
G For a doctor, harnessing the placebo's power doesn't mean intentionally mislabelling pills. Instead, a doctor could simply provide a slightly more positive message about a treatment, lending the power of expectations to that of pharmaceuticals. 'When doctors set patients' expectations high, Maxalt becomes more effective,' lead author of the study Rami Burstein said in a press statement. Of course, this sort of intentional expectation-setting needs to be done carefully. Doctors have an ethical obligation not to mislead patients or withhold important information. But that doesn't mean that making sure to provide subtle positive cues about the effectiveness of a medication - especially when those very cues might well make it work more effectively - is a bad idea. As Ted Kaptchuk, one of the study's co-authors, put it, 'the placebo effect is an unacknowledged partner for powerful medications.'
The text has seven paragraphs, A-G. Which paragraph contains the following information?
| Question | A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 an explanation of the neurological process by which placebos work | |||||||
| 15 the origin of the word 'placebo' | |||||||
| 16 a recommendation as to how medical professionals can take advantage of the placebo effect | |||||||
| 17 mention of how the appearance of placebos can affect how well they work |
Complete the sentences below. Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
18 It appears that placebos can treat or reduce the of a wide range of conditions.
19 The placebo effect happens when our has an effect on how our body feels.
20 Doctors have long believed it to be their responsibility not only to treat patients' medical conditions, but also to improve their .
21 An example of a situation where a placebo has little or no effect is if a patient has an .
22 It has been shown that patients will feel in their muscles if they are given a placebo called a muscle stimulator.
23 A related phenomenon, known as the effect, convinces people that a treatment will do them harm.
24 Two factors which influence the effectiveness of a placebo pill are its and its size.
Choose TWO correct answers.
Which TWO findings were observed in the Harvard Medical School study?
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3.
Ecologist Derek Gow looks at the challenges of 'rewilding' - restoring areas of land to the wild and reintroducing their original animal species.
In Holland they have developed a creative landscape philosophy called 'New Nature', and the most iconic illustration of this is the site called the Oostvaardersplassen, near Amsterdam. Here, throughout 6,000 enclosed hectares, feral Heck bulls excavate amphibian ponds with their hooves and horns, while stags and stallions battle fiercely for possession of herds of females. These creatures present a living vision that many 'rewilders' adore. Although this project may present a primeval impression, in reality it is a completely artificial though courageous creation, limited by fences, budgets, an adjacent main railway line, surrounding land users and fickle political support. Less than a lifetime ago the landscape these 'wild' herbivores now occupy was the bed of the North Sea.
Despite the contention that surrounds such projects, the Oostvaardersplassen has produced some inspirational results. Spoonbills have returned to breed in ever increasing numbers, creating a surplus population which has overlapped back into Britain. Sea eagles have raised their first nestlings in centuries, nourished by the ample supply of deer that the site affords. Projects of this type, which restore key species or re-engineer landscapes to allow natural processes such as seasonal flooding or forest fires to reoccur, have demonstrated that when nature is given free rein, the results which arise can be truly spectacular. Are we, however, prepared to live in landscapes where these processes, even if appropriately modified, become part of our own experience?
While space is without a doubt one of the biggest obstacles facing rewilders, a range of structural, social and cultural issues can also conspire to hinder change. As an example, I have been involved with the restoration of the Eurasian beaver - a large rodent that builds complex structures from wood, stones and mud across rivers - in Britain since the early 1990s. Although they once had a world range which extended from Britain to China and numbered tens of millions, beavers were hunted virtually to extinction by humans as a result of an insatiable demand for their fur, scent glands and meat. They have been widely reintroduced throughout much of their former European range as an awareness of their critical function in the creation of wetland habitats has developed. Beaver-generated landscapes also play a significant part in the retention and purification of water. There is an abundance of entirely suitable beaver habitat available in Britain, and despite the fact that occasional conflicts will arise between beavers' engineering activities and human land use, European experience again demonstrates quite ably that these conflicts are manageable. Despite this well-established knowledge, the restoration of beavers in Britain has proven to be a pitifully slow process. Political apathy and indifference have coupled with the total lack of knowledge of opponents who simply want no change to the status quo. The official trials in Scotland and England have focused on the creation of tiny populations which remain extremely fragile.
If a species as benevolent as the beaver presents a significant challenge, then how much more difficult will it be to restore predators? While science and experience may dictate that wolves pose no significant threat to humans, their tentative re-colonisation of many western European countries over the course of the last few decades has often evoked a primal response. Farmers' groups have trapped them in pits in France and burnt them to death; hunters have poisoned them for killing 'their' deer; kindergarten teachers have implored forest authorities to remove them from the landscape to ensure that this medieval menace does not lurk in the dark when their tiny children go to school on a winter's morning. Attitude change, it would seem, is a slow and painful process, one not easily turned round by knowledge.
Any start to rewilding is therefore likely to be humble. Despite a measured approach, it is probable that fishermen and their strident support groups may not welcome the addition of the pelican, a 15kg water bird, to the large number of predators which they already detest. The scientific community may dislike the pragmatism required on a semi-industrial scale to restore small species to remake the base of essential food chains if newly available habitats emerge. Many farmers, despite the sums they would be paid, will not wish to see their once-drained bogs rehydrated, their dead animals consumed by sea eagles or their pastures revert to scrub.
In the end it comes down to changing patterns. We have moulded the landscapes of the world as a species to suit our own passing needs, predilections and pleasures. While change is commonly opposed on whatever basis arises, change is nevertheless a constant in life. It is likely that 'rewilding' or 'New Nature' - call it what you will - could become a base movement which affords a fresh opportunity to approach nature conservation in a fashion which will, over time, be all the more rewarding for the surprises it presents.
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Complete the summary using the list of words, A - H, below. Write the correct letter in boxes 32-36 on your answer sheet.
Problems of Rewilding Projects
Rewilding projects have to deal with numerous challenges. For example, the reintroduction of beavers to Britain has faced from government ministers together with on the part of opponents to the scheme. Where wolves have been reintroduced in western Europe, there has been widespread against these animals, despite clear that the species poses virtually no to them.
Drag the correct letter from the list below and drop it onto the matching gap.
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in the text? Write YES if it agrees, NO if it contradicts, or NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say.