IELTSwithJurabek
Are you ready to begin your reading test?
Please wait
Are you ready to begin your reading test?
PASSAGE 1
Read the text and answer questions 1-13
Triumph of the City, by Edward Glaeser, is a thrilling and very readable hymn of praise to an invention so vast and so effective that it is generally taken for granted. More than half the global population already live in urban areas and, every month, five million more flood into the cities of the developed and developing worlds. The crowds and poverty of some of these modern cities may horrify us. They should not, says Glaeser: they are signs of growth, energy and aspiration. Cities are our best and brightest hope.
This idea has had more than two hundred years of resistance. Not long after the Industrial Revolution began in Britain, the Romantic poets turned away from the smoke and factories of their cities to celebrate the air and light of untouched nature. In 19th-century America, the writer Henry David Thoreau retreated to the wilderness of Walden Pond to live the solitary, simple life, and convinced generations of Americans that cities were bad and nature was good.
They had, Glaeser admits, a point. The early industrial cities were dirty, since they lacked efficient waste disposal systems, and disease spread rapidly among the population. But more importantly they were profitable, and there were enormous commercial incentives to make them work, as well as political ones. Their transformation could be achieved at a stroke: in the second half of the 19th century, the French Emperor Napoleon III gave Baron Haussmann unrestricted power to turn the slum-infested city of Paris into one of the wonders and delights of the modern world. Or the transformation could be done by trial and error: Glaeser gives a brilliant account of the stop-start progression of New York to its late 20th-century position as the cultural and economic centre of the world. Either way, Paris, New York and other cities developed because they were truly effective markets of ideas and innovation.
For these and many other reasons, we should not be so upset by the spectacle of urban poverty. The poor flock to cities in the hope of becoming richer, which, by and large, they do. They also reinvigorate the economy of the city. It is folly to drive them away by forcing property prices to soar with unreasonable planning regulations. Instead, cities should build more houses and thereby hold property prices in check.
It can go wrong, of course. In Glaeser's view, this is primarily because municipal authorities fail to understand the principal virtues of their cities. The heart of Paris, as many Parisians say, is turning into a museum because of the desire to preserve Baron Haussmann's 19th-century boulevards. Glaeser defends their preservation but argues that in the 1950s the French made a mistake in establishing a huge high-rise commercial development - La Defense - on the outskirts of the city. Far better, he says, to have turned the central area of Montparnasse into a new commercial district. This would have revitalised much of the city centre without destroying its fabric. In India, Mumbai could save itself from ever-more inefficient sprawl over the surrounding area simply by relaxing the rules presently imposed on the height of new constructions.
In America, it is the suburbs that have proved to be the real disaster. Glaeser is repentant on this subject himself. He moved to the suburbs when he had children. His entirely legitimate excuse is that the government made him, and millions like him, do it. By under-taxing petrol and imposing tight planning restrictions on inner cities that drove up the cost of property, it made flight to the suburbs more or less inevitable for the middle classes.
This is a disaster because nothing is more inefficient than a suburb. Suburbanites mingle less and lose the face-to-face contact that makes being an urbanite so much more creative. Moreover, houses are costlier to heat and cool than flats, and suburbanites drive thousands more miles per year than city dwellers. Every aspect of life involves more consumption. This leads to the strongest and newest argument in favour of cities - they are good for the environment. To live in the country or the suburbs is to have a vastly larger carbon footprint than any urbanite.
Full of characters and accessible information, this is a tremendous book, not least because, like me, you will find yourself constantly seeking reasons to disagree. Like the poor in the city, this is a sign of success. If you hate the city and get moist-eyed at the thought of the country then, one way or another, Glaeser is the man you will have to take on.
Complete the notes below. Write ONE WORD ONLY.
Problems with early cities: dirt and , but there were commercial and reasons for improving them.
Urban poverty is not a major problem because poor people generally get and help to develop the urban .
Cities do have some problems - for example, the centre of Paris is becoming a . In the US, the middle classes have moved to the suburbs due to cheap petrol and high prices in inner cities.
Disadvantages of suburbs include less personal and increased of resources such as heating.
Choose TRUE, FALSE or NOT GIVEN.
PASSAGE 2
Read the text and answer questions 14-26
A. Parrots are found across the tropics and in all southern hemisphere continents except Antarctica, but nowhere do they display such a richness of diversity and form as in Australia. One-sixth of the world's 345 parrot species are found there, and Australia has long been renowned for the number and variety of its parrots.
B. In the 16th century, the German cartographer Mercator made a world map that included a place, somewhere near present-day Australia, that he named Terra Psittacorum - the Land of Parrots - and the first European settlers in Australia often referred to the country as Parrot Land. In 1865, the celebrated British naturalist and wildlife artist John Gould said: "No group of birds gives Australia so tropical and benign an air as the numerous species of this great family by which it is tenanted."
C. Parrots are descendants of an ancient line. Due to their great diversity, and since most species inhabit Africa, Australia and South America, it seems almost certain that parrots originated millions of years ago on the ancient southern continent of Gondwana, before it broke up into the separate southern hemisphere continents we know today. Much of Gondwana comprised vast rainforests intersected by huge slow-flowing rivers and expansive lakes, but by eight million years ago, great changes were underway. The centre of the continent of Australia had begun to dry out, and the rainforests that once covered it gradually contracted to the continental margins, where, to a limited extent, they still exist today.
D. The creatures that remained in those shrinking rainforests had to adapt to the drier conditions or face extinction. Reacting to these desperate circumstances, the parrot family, typically found in jungles in other parts of the world, has populated some of Australia's harshest environments. The parrots spread from ancestral forests through eucalypt woodlands to colonise the central deserts of Australia, and as a consequence they diversified into a wide range of species with adaptations that reflect the many changes animals and plants had to make to survive in these areas.
E. These evolutionary pressures helped mould keratin, the substance from which beaks are made, into a range of tools capable of gathering the new food types favoured by various species of parrot. The size of a parrot's short, blunt beak and the length of that beak's curved upper section are related to the type of food each species eats. Some have comparatively long beaks that are perfect for extracting seeds from fruit; others have broader and stronger beaks that are designed for cracking hard seeds.
F. Differently shaped beaks are not the only adaptations that have been made during the developing relationship between parrots and their food plants. Like all of Australia's many honey-eating birds, the rainbow-coloured lorikeets and the flowers on which they feed have long coevolved, with features such as the shape and colour of the flowers adapted to the bird's particular needs. For example, red is the most attractive colour to birds, and thus flowers which depend on birds for pollination are more often red, and lorikeets have tongues with bristles which help them to collect as much pollen as possible.
G. Today, most of Australia's parrots inhabit woodland and open forest, and their numbers decline towards both deserts and wetter areas. The majority are nomadic to some degree, moving around to take advantage of feeding and breeding places. Two of the dry country parrots, the pink and grey galah and the pink, white and yellow corella, have expanded their ranges in recent years. They are among the species that have adapted well to the changes brought about by European settlement: forest felling created grasslands where galahs and corellas thrive.
H. But other parrot species did not fare so well when their environments were altered. The clearing of large areas of rainforest is probably responsible for the disappearance of the double-eyed fig parrot, and numbers of ground parrots declined when a great part of their habitat was destroyed by the draining of coastal swamps. Even some parrot species that benefited from forest clearing at first are now confronted by a shortage of nesting sites due to further man-made changes.
I. New conditions also sometimes favour an incoming species over one that originally inhabited the area. For example, after farmers cleared large areas of forest on Kangaroo Island off the coast of South Australia, the island was colonised by galahs. They were soon going down holes and destroying black cockatoo eggs in order to take the hole for their own use. Their success precipitated a partial collapse in the black cockatoo population when the latter lost the struggle for scarce nesting hollows.
J. There may be no final answer to ensuring an equitable balance between parrot species. Nest box programmes help ease the shortage of nesting sites in some places, but there are not enough, they are expensive and they are not an adequate substitute for large, old trees, such as the habitat they represent and the nectar, pollen and seeds they provide. Competition between parrots for nest sites is a result of the changes we humans have made to the Earth. We are the most widespread and dangerous competitors that parrots have ever had to face, but we also have the knowledge and skill to maintain the wonderfully rich diversity of Australia's parrots. All we need is the will to do so.
Which paragraph contains the following information? Choose the correct letter, A-J.
| Question | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 an example of how one parrot species may survive at the expense of another | ||||||||||
| 15 a description of how plants may adapt to attract birds | ||||||||||
| 16 an example of two parrot species which benefited from changes to the environment | ||||||||||
| 17 how the varied Australian landscape resulted in a great variety of parrot species | ||||||||||
| 18 a reason why most parrot species are native to the southern hemisphere | ||||||||||
| 19 an example of a parrot species which did not survive changes to its habitat |
Choose the correct answer.
Complete the summary below. Write NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS AND/OR A NUMBER.
There are 345 varieties of parrot in existence and, of these, live in Australia. As early as the , the mapmaker recognized that parrots lived in that part of the world. , the famous painter of animals and birds, commented on the size and beauty of the Australian parrot family.
PASSAGE 3
Read the text and answer questions 27-40
A. Most social scientists stubbornly resist the idea that animals have culture. Even such advanced cetacean mammals as whales and dolphins clearly do not have art, literature, or architecture. But patient observation over many years has begun to reveal behaviours that can only have been learnt from other whales. And that, say whale biologists, constitutes culture.
B. So far, humpback and killer whales provide the best evidence of culture in cetaceans, and the song of the male humpback is among the most striking examples. Humpback populations in different oceans sing different songs, but within the same ocean they all stick to the same one. However, during the breeding season the sounds change, as it appears that females are drawn to novel songs. One male might add an extra set of groans; another might drop a series of grunts. Soon all the other males have altered their own rendition to incorporate the changes until they are once again singing the same song. Since this occurs among thousands of whales spread across a vast part of the planet, the change cannot be in response to any factor in the animals' environment. The latest version of the song can be learnt only from other whales - almost certainly by imitation.
C. Culture plays an even bigger part in the life of killer whales. Nowhere is this more obvious than along the north-west coast of America, where killer whales are split into two distinct populations - residents and transients. They live in the same stretch of water, but they do not mingle. In effect, they belong to two quite separate cultures. Residents live in stable groups, or pods, made up of two or three mothers and their offspring - perhaps 20 whales in all. Calves stay with their mothers throughout adulthood, and in many years of observation no one has ever seen a whale switch pods. Transients travel in smaller, more changeable groups of between three and six.
D. One of the most obvious distinctions between the transient and resident societies is the way they impart information. Killer whales detect prey with a range of echo-locating clicks, but converse with a vocabulary of squeaks, whistles and whines. Transients have only a few such calls, and all transient societies share the same ones. Residents have a much more extensive repertoire, and each family group has its own unique and distinctive set of calls. Despite regular interaction between them, each resident pod sticks firmly to its own dialect. Research shows these dialects are maintained for at least 40 years.
E. To qualify as part of killer whale culture, dialects must be learnt from other members of the pod. Animals with different dialects share the same waters, so the variations cannot be a product of the physical environment. "And we can throw out the notion that the dialects are inherited," says Lance Barrett-Lennard of the University of British Columbia. He has spent the past seven years analyzing DNA from 270 whales. His paternity tests reveal that female killer whales invariably attract mates from outside their own pod - males with a very different dialect. If dialects were programmed by genetics, call patterns from both father and mother would be passed on to the calf. "A calf uses the calls of its maternal pod very precisely. There is no input from the father," says Barrett-Lennard.
F. The question still remains - is this culture? It is, according to Frans de Waal of Emory University in Atlanta, who argues that culture is just another biological adaptation that has evolved in many creatures. One benefit of viewing culture in this way is that you can start to understand how and why it might have arisen in these creatures. Whales have several biological attributes that give them an advantage in social learning. Apart from their advanced mental abilities, they are adept at recognizing sounds: ideal for communication in the marine environment. Many species spend years rearing their offspring, and live in small, stable, multi-generational societies, a social system that provides ample opportunity for teaching and learning.
G. But why have cetaceans evolved the ability to learn from other group members? Experts in whale biology believe that ecological factors and the need to adapt to sudden changes in the environment played a large part in the emergence of culture. Although the ocean is a relatively stable habitat in many ways, it is highly changeable in one crucial respect - the availability of food. One moment there might be a plentiful supply of fish, the next they have disappeared. When that happens, the past experience of the senior members of the group - and the ability to share this knowledge - is a huge asset. The dialects of killer whales allow members of the groups to identify each other, enabling them to share information about food hot spots. Among resident killer whales, it also allows females to avoid inbreeding by picking out a mate with a strange dialect from outside their pods, says Barrett-Lennard.
H. The importance of shared information seems to have led to biological changes in at least some species of whale. Female killer whales, like humans, are very unusual in that they live up to a quarter of a century after they had their last offspring. This only makes sense if they have something useful to give their descendants. And what whale matriarchs offer is the most important thing of all - cultural knowledge, vital for the group's survival, passed directly from one generation to the next.
Choose TRUE, FALSE or NOT GIVEN.
Complete the summary below. Write NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS.
It has been observed that resident killer whales invariably live in fixed family groups, known as . As the same areas of ocean contain many different groups with widely varying dialects, it is clear that these differences could not have emerged as a result of the whales' . According to tests conducted by Lance Barrett-Lennard, a calf communicates exclusively with the dialect of the group to which its belongs.
Choose THREE correct answers.
Which paragraph contains the following information? Choose the correct letter, A-H.
| Question | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38 an example of the kind of information passed by whales to each other | ||||||||
| 39 a reference to variations in communication styles between different cultures within one species | ||||||||
| 40 ways in which the skills of whales are favorable for the development of culture |