IELTSwithJurabek
Are you ready to begin your reading test?
Please wait
Are you ready to begin your reading test?
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading Passage 1 below.
A look at the early history of boats powered by steam.
During the 1600s, very early in the development of steam engines, inventive spirits like the Frenchman Denis Papin dreamed of - and experimented with - boats driven by steam, rather than by the wind or human effort, but many decades passed before those visions became reality.
Englishman Jonathan Hulls took out patents on a steamboat in 1736, but it was to be driven by a Newcomen engine, which was heavy and therefore inefficient, and would never be a success. In 1763, William Henry, an American, put a Watt steam engine in a boat, but it sank. Nearly 20 years later, in the 1780s, a steam-powered paddle-wheeler managed to last fifteen minutes against the current on the River Saone in France, but lacked the endurance for longer trips. Developments elsewhere included a boat driven by a steam-powered water-jet and able to do six kilometres per hour. However, all these steamboats were either too slow or too expensive to run. For example, American John Fitch successfully trialled his first steamboat in 1787, but although he tried a number of designs and solved many technical challenges - one of his boats could even travel at 13 km/h - he could never convince sceptics that steamboats would pay.
The 19th century came before real success could be claimed. In Scotland in 1802, Lord Dundas launched the steamboat Charlotte Dundas, which was driven by a paddle wheel and had an improved engine designed by William Symington. Barges, some weighing as much as 70 tonnes, were towed by this steamboat 30 kilometres along the Forth and Clyde Canal to Glasgow, Scotland's second city.
Soon after, success came to American Robert Fulton, whose countrymen called him 'the father of the steamboat'. Inspired by news of the Charlotte Dundas, Fulton ran steamboat trials on the River Seine, in an attempt to attract French support for his submarine Nautilus. He later imported a Boulton-Watt steam engine and built a boat to use it in. In 1807, the Clermont began a scheduled passenger steamboat service between New York and Albany, 250 kilometres up the Hudson River, taking 30 hours for the trip. Within few years, steamers were running on the St Lawrence River in Canada and would soon appear on other rivers and lakes, including the Mississippi River, a most famous venue for the paddle-wheelers.
Back in Scotland, Fulton's ideas inspired Henry Bell, who launched his Comet in 1812 on the Clyde between Glasgow and Greenock. Inside a decade, dozens of steamboats were to be seen on the rivers, lochs and canals of Scotland, carrying cargo and occasionally passengers. The age of steamboats had come.
Once steamboats were carrying passengers and industrial goods along the inland waterways and sheltered coastlines of Europe, North America and elsewhere, the challenge became to send steamboats onto the open ocean, such as across the Atlantic Ocean, between Europe and the US. Travelling under steam power alone would require engines to use less coal so the ship could stay at sea for several weeks. In order to provide a reliable service, it was also necessary to replace paddle wheels as a source of power with something less affected by the rolling of the ship.
Without waiting for such breakthroughs, crossings under a combination of steam and sail got underway in 1819 with the American ship Savannah. A regular service took another two decades and introduced the famous name of Cunard. Securing the British government contract for the mail service across the Atlantic, Samuel Cunard established a shipping line in 1840, soon carrying passengers as well, and offering guaranteed sailing dates. Cunard's first ships used a sail-steam combination, but the era of the passenger liner, using steam alone, was getting close.
When it came to building the ships, the versatile British engineer Isambard Kingdom Brunel set the pace. Brunel, brilliant and daring, had already built the Great Western Railway. He created ever bigger ships - faster, more luxurious and comfortable for passengers. The Great Western, launched in 1838, was 70 metres long and crossed from Bristol to New York in just fifteen days. The largest paddle steamer ever built was Brunel's Great Eastern. Ultimately too expensive to run as a passenger ship, it was leased to lay the first submarine telegraph cable from Europe to America. His 1853 Great Britain, nearly 100 metres long and luxuriously appointed, was the first ocean-going steamship made of iron, and the first to use the underwater screw propeller for powering movement in place of paddle wheels. The idea of the screw had been around since the experiments of the American John Stevens in 1803, but only in 1838 did a large steamer use one, the riverboat Archimedes built by Francis Pettit Smith. Later ships had twin screws for reliability.
In many modern ships, steam turbines have replaced engines with pistons, with fuel oil instead of coal to fire the boilers. Diesel engines keep others moving. The largest ships afloat now would dwarf Brunel's Great Eastern (launched in 1860); the Atlantic can be crossed in only four days. But in whatever form, the ever-evolving descendants of the original visions of Denis Papin and Robert Fulton continue to travel the seas in vast numbers.
Complete the table below. Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer. Write your answers in boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 1730s | The engine of Jonathan Hulls' steamboat was due to its weight. |
| 1780s | A French paddle steamer did not have the to keep going for more than a quarter of an hour. |
| 1780s | John Fitch overcame a number of problems with his steamboat designs. |
| Early 1800s | In France, Fulton used a steamboat to try to raise interest in a . |
| Early 1800s | Passengers in the US began to be carried regularly by a steamboat called the . |
| 1812 onwards | In Scotland, steamboats transported some passengers, but mostly . |
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
In boxes 7-13, write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this.
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14-26, which are based on Reading Passage 2 below.
A Music is becoming ever more popular electronically. To meet our craving for music, internet sites are using increasingly sophisticated ways of putting us in touch with artists we may not even know we like. Most work by trawling our existing files or online listening habits and looking for patterns so they can recommend new artists for their subscribers to listen to. The search often turns up surprises. But is it possible to tease apart our likes and dislikes to identify precisely what it is about some music that thrills us or leaves us cold?
B For centuries composers have sought to create unforgettable music using accepted notions about the emotional appeal of certain combinations of sounds, yet only now are scientists starting to uncover what it is about these combinations that can have such a dramatic effect on our minds. Given that archaeologists have found musical instruments played by Neanderthals at least 50,000 years ago, why have scientists taken so long to investigate such a source of pleasure?
C "For psychologists, who are always desperate to show that their work is rigorous, there's an image problem in tackling the emotionality of music," says Professor Norman Cook of Kansai University in Osaka, Japan, one of the pioneers of the new science of music. "Emotion is such a slippery topic." The other problem, says Cook, is the long-standing principle among psychologists that our response to music is an acquired one, rather than something that is stimulated by the effect of sound on our brain cells. Yet one of the first insights to emerge from this new branch of psychology is that music affects our brains at a very basic level.
D Together with his colleague, Professor Takefumi Hayashi, Cook has been investigating one of the best-known examples of the emotional impact of music: the difference between major and minor chords. For centuries, composers have known that notes arranged to form major chords sound happy and upbeat, while those in minor chords sound mournful. In tests, even three-year-olds have been shown to link music in a major mode to happy faces and minor modes to sad faces.
E According to Cook, analysis of how people respond to notes suggests a link with how our brains interpret certain sounds in everyday life. He points out that sad-sounding minor chords can be formed by raising the pitch of any of a set of notes, while dropping the pitch produces a major chord. The same change in pitch works as an emotional telltale in communication between some mammals, where rising pitch is used to communicate weakness or defeat, while falling pitch signals social dominance. It's also present in our speech. "A rising inflection is used to denote questions, politeness or deference, whereas a falling inflection signals dominance," says Cook.
F This suggests that music in major and minor modes taps into some very basic features of how we relate to the world and each other - perhaps dating back millions of years. Could music in general be doing something similar? Quite possibly, according to research into how music triggers certain types of brain activity. At McGill University in Canada, Professor Robert Zatorre and his colleagues have carried out studies in which volunteers listen to different types of music while their brain activity is monitored. The biggest surprise was the evidence that pleasurable music activates brain circuitry which has been in existence in the human brain for thousands of years, says Zatorre. "We share it with rats and other distant relatives on the evolutionary tree - and it's typically associated with biological rewards, like food, for example."
G At the University of Oxford, Dr Joyce Chen has been looking into another celebrated feature of music - the irresistibility of rhythm. Her interest was sparked by studies involving patients with movement difficulties. "If music that had a strong rhythm - say, a marching band - was played to these patients, they were able to improve their walking ability," says Chen. In an attempt to find out why the simple act of listening to music might help disabled patients, Dr Chen and colleagues from the International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research in Montreal carried out brain scans on volunteers who were listening to rhythmic sounds. The criteria for selecting these volunteers were that they should be in first-rate physical health but musically untrained. The results have been another revelation. Chen and her colleagues found the rhythms triggered activity in parts of the brain linked to hearing, but something even more surprising was that the rhythms also triggered activity in the motor regions of the brain, linked to active movement.
H "Somehow, the mere act of just listening triggers motor-neural activity. Maybe this is one reason why we often tap our feet, move or dance when hearing music," says Chen. She believes the discovery of this deep connection between music and movement may cast light on why disabled patients can benefit from listening to music - and could also prove useful with other impairments such as those involved in sound production. "It's been shown that people who talk with a stutter might have problems in this auditory-motor loop."
I For researchers working in this new area of science, these early discoveries hold the promise of much more to come. Zatorre and his colleagues are investigating whether some people have more musical brains than others. "We can see certain subtle brain features that can tell us how well somebody can do things like identify a slight change in a melody," explains Zatorre. "This ability could be enhanced by training - just like someone born with a predisposition to building strong muscles can enhance them by taking up weightlifting."
Reading Passage 2 has nine paragraphs, A-I.
Which paragraph contains the following information? Write the correct letter, A-I, in boxes 14-18.
| Statement | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 A reference to studies involving children. | |||||||||
| 15 A mention of the discovery of significant artefacts. | |||||||||
| 16 Reasons why a particular aspect of music has not been researched. | |||||||||
| 17 A mention of an unexpected discovery involving two different areas of the brain. | |||||||||
| 18 A comparison of tone variations produced by certain animals and humans. |
Complete the summary below. Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.
A study involving collaboration between researchers in Oxford and Montreal
The participants in this study led by Dr Chen were chosen because they were not musicians, and they demonstrated a good state of . The participants were given , while music with a very noticeable rhythm was being played.
Previous research had indicated that listening to this type of music seemed to be of assistance to some people. By listening to it, their ability had definitely got better. The findings of Dr Chen's study proved most informative.
Look at the following statements (Questions 23-26) and the list of researchers below. Match each statement with the correct researcher, A-C. You may use any letter more than once.
List of Researchers
A Professor Norman Cook B Professor Robert Zatorre C Dr Joyce Chen
| A | B | C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Research into the brain activity set off by music may help people with speech defects. | |||
| 24 It may be possible in time to improve a person's ability to recognise certain musical characteristics. | |||
| 25 The way listeners react to certain musical combinations may be similar to the way they react to other noises. | |||
| 26 When a person reacts positively to music, the same parts of the brain are stimulated as when certain animals react to a positive outcome. |
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.
Is that a bird in the sky? A plane? No, it's a pterosaur. Kate Thomas meets Professor Matthew Wilkinson, who built a life-size model to find out how this prehistoric predator ever got off the ground.
Pterosaurs existed from the Triassic period, 220 million years ago, to the end of the Cretaceous period, 65 million years ago, when South America pulled away from Africa and the South Atlantic was formed. They are among the least understood of all the extinct reptiles that once spent their lives in the skies while the dinosaurs dominated the land. Pterosaurs had no feathers, but at least part of their bodies was covered in hair, not unlike bats. Some believe this is an indication they were warm-blooded. Researchers also debate whether pterosaurs travelled on the ground by walking on their hind legs, like birds, or by using all fours, relying on their three-toed front feet as well as their four-toed rear feet.
Pterosaurs were vertebrates, meaning they were the first species possessing backbones to become airborne, but scientists have never quite understood their flight technique. How, they wondered, did such a heavy creature ever manage to take off? How could a wing that appears to have been supported by fine, hollow bones have carried one into the sky? Then came the discovery of a site in Brazil's Araripe basin. Here, not only were hundreds of fossils of amphibians* and other reptiles found, but archaeologists unearthed a number of very well-preserved pterosaurs. The anhanguera - a fish-eating sub-species of pterosaur that ruled the skies in the Cretaceous period - was among them. With a wingspan of up to 12 metres, they would have made an amazing sight in the sky - had any human been there to witness it.
'I've been studying pterosaurs for about eight years now,' says Dr Matthew Wilkinson, a professor of zoology at Cambridge University. With an anhanguera fossil as his model, Wilkinson began gradually reconstructing its skeletal structure in his Cambridge studio. The probability of finding three-dimensional pterosaur fossils anywhere is slim. 'That was quite a find,' he says. 'Their bones are usually crushed to dust.' Once the structure was complete, it inspired him to make a robot version as a way to understand the animal's locomotion. With a team of model-makers, he has built a remote-controlled pterosaur in his studio. 'Fossils show just how large these creatures were. I've always been interested in how they managed to launch themselves, so I thought the real test would be to actually build one and fly it.'
Wilkinson hasn't been alone in his desire to recreate a prehistoric beast. Swiss scientists recently announced they had built an amphibious robot that could walk on land and swim in water using the sort of backbone movements that must have been employed by the first creatures to crawl from the sea. But Wilkinson had the added complication of working out his beast's flight technique. Unlike those of bats or flying squirrels, pterosaur wings - soft, stretchy membranes of skin tissue - are thought to have reached from the chest right to the ankle, reinforced by fibres that stiffened the wing and prevented tearing. Smaller subspecies flapped their wings during takeoff. That may have explained the creatures' flexibility, but it did not answer the most pressing question: how did such heavy animals manage to launch themselves into the sky? Working with researchers in London and Berlin, Wilkinson began to piece together the puzzle.
It emerged that the anhanguera had an elongated limb called the pteroid. It had previously been thought the pteroid pointed towards the shoulder of the creature and supported a soft forewing in front of the arm. But if that were the case, the forewing would have been too small and ineffectual for flight. However, to the surprise of many scientists, fossils from the Araripe basin showed the pteroid possibly faced the opposite way, creating a much greater forewing that would have caught the air, working in the same way as the flaps on the wings of an aeroplane. So, with both feet on the ground, the anhanguera might have simply faced into the wind, spread its wings and risen up into the sky. Initial trials in wind tunnels proved the point - models of pterosaurs with forward-facing pteroids were not only adept at gliding, but were agile flyers in spite of their size. 'This high-lift capability would have significantly reduced the minimum flight speed, allowing even the largest forms to take off without difficulty,' Wilkinson says. 'It would have enabled them to glide very slowly and may have been instrumental in the evolution of large size by the pterosaurs.'
Resting in the grass at the test site near Cambridge, the robot-model's wings ripple in the wind. In flight, the flexible membrane, while much stiffer than the real thing, allows for a smooth takeoff and landing. But the model has been troubled by other mechanical problems. 'Unlike an aircraft, which is stabilised by the tail wing at the back, the model is stabilised by its head, which is the most problematic bit as far as we're concerned,' Wilkinson says. 'We've had to take it flying without the head attached so far.' When it flies with its head attached, Wilkinson will finally have proved his point.
So what's next for the zoologist - perhaps a full-size Tyrannosaurus rex? 'No,' he tells me: 'We're desperate to build really big pterosaurs. We're talking about creatures with even greater wingspans, weighing a quarter of a ton. But,' he adds, just as one begins to fear for the safety and stress levels of pilots landing nearby at Cambridge City Airport, 'it's more likely we'll start off with one of the smaller, flapping pterosaurs.' This is certainly more reassuring. Let's hope he is content to leave it at that.
* amphibians: animals that can live both in water and on land
Complete the summary below using the list of words, A-L. Write the correct letter, A-L, in boxes 27-32.
27 Pterosaurs are believed to have existed until the end of the Cretaceous period. They are classed as 27 which were capable of flight, although, unlike modern species, they had some 28. There are two theories as to how they moved on land: perhaps with all their feet or by using their 29 only. Another mystery has concerned the ability of the pterosaur to fly despite its immense 30, and the fact that the bones making up the wing did not have great 31. Thanks to reptile fossils found in Brazil, we now know that the subspecies known as anhanguera had wings that were 12 metres across and that it mainly survived on 32.
List of Words
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 3?
In boxes 33-36, write YES if the statement agrees with the claims of the writer, NO if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer, or NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this.
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.